The claim against our firm's commercial client was largely rejected.

Our client – one of the leading companies in the Israeli market in the field of import, marketing, and distribution – was sued for NIS 75,000 by one of its customers, for alleged damages and losses, allegedly caused as a result of a supposedly faulty installation of a luxury outdoor kitchen.

The plaintiff supported his claim with an expert opinion prepared by an engineer on his behalf. The cross-examinations we conducted during the hearing demolished both the plaintiff's version and his witnesses", as well as the professional credibility of the expert, leading the court to determine in its ruling: "The expert opinion of the plaintiff's expert is laden with defects and failures that cast doubt on its accuracy and the possibility of relying on it. The witness left an untrustworthy impression...".

After the submission of written summaries, the court accepted all our claims, and ruled in favor of the plaintiff for only NIS 6,500 out of his entire claim, due to trivial matters, while affirming our position that the company's work in installing the outdoor kitchen was performed flawlessly.

Did you like the article? Feel free to share.

WhatsApp
Email
Share on LinkedIn

More success stories

Victory in the Regional Labor Court

We are pleased to update you on another significant achievement of our firm, as part of an appeal process that took place at the Regional Labor Court in Tel Aviv. A company, which is one of our firm's clients, approached

Read more »

Victory in the District Court

We are pleased to update you on another significant victory for our firm, within the framework of an appeal that took place at the Lod District Court. What are we talking about? In a judgment handed down by the court

Read more »

Accessibility Toolbar

Your referral is on its way to us.
Talk to you soon

For legal advice